|
Author
|
Message
|
19 Jun 2009 14:30:13 IST
|
|
|
if i had the proof ..i wud have given u along with the statement...but the order i am giving is absolutely correct.
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:31:15 IST
|
|
|
how can u say that nugo .........i guess the order is just reverse of wat u wrote
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:31:19 IST
|
|
|
from where have u got the answer??????????
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:31:21 IST
|
|
|
Well my support still to nugo because i have called my sir right now and asked him this question his answer was the same as mine ........
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:33:02 IST
|
|
|
i m backing my answer till someone give me a solid reason to discard it...
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:34:34 IST
|
|
|
pka values .. 3 florophenol = 9.29 3 chlorophenol = 9.1 numbers dont lie. so we have the answer now .. explanation needed.
|
Everyone's Stupid. |
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:35:54 IST
|
|
|
I think bents rule is the perfect explanation for this ........Wat u think guys ?????Any other in your mind ????????
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:38:04 IST
|
|
|
just find the fault in the reason given by me n taran?
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 14:38:47 IST
|
|
|
Well may be the dominance factor comes into play .....
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 15:03:49 IST
|
|
|
3-chlorophenol is more acidic
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Jun 2009 16:13:42 IST
|
|
|
In fluorophenol 2p orbital of C overlaps 2p orbital of F.....bt in chlorophenol 3p of Cl overlaps with 2p of C . Due to this ,overlapping in case of fluoro will be more intense...... +M (F)>+M(Cl).....thus Fluorine will hinder d entry of lone pair of oxygen.......therefore chlorophenol will be more acidic
|
this reply:
5 points
(with 1

in
1
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
22 Jan 2012 03:31:15 IST
|
|
|
all the chlorophenols are more more acidic than florophenol(for any given position)reason-Back bonding
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
22 Jan 2012 03:31:58 IST
|
|
|
all the chlorophenols are more more acidic than florophenol(for any given position)reason-Back bonding
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
22 Jan 2012 10:47:08 IST
|
|
|
3-f-Ph
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
22 Jan 2012 10:48:31 IST
|
|
|
inductive effect is considered only in meta positions
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012 20:47:01 IST
|
|
|
3-chloro phenol is more acidicthis is according to the concept of back bonding
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012 20:47:21 IST
|
|
|
3-chloro phenol is more acidicthis is according to the concept of back bonding
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012 20:48:55 IST
|
|
|
And i,m it very sure about it
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012 20:59:17 IST
|
|
|
chlorine having vacant d - orbital will take up electrons from carbon which will attract the electron from above making release of H+ easy
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012 20:59:47 IST
|
|
|
hope u will get my point
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|