|
Author
|
Message
|
18 Feb 2010 13:51:21 IST
|
|
|
galileo concluded that the rate of change of velocity with time is a constant of motion for all objects in a free fall. on the other hand, the change in velocity with distance is not constant- it decreases with increasing distance of fall. how??
|
|
|
|
18 Feb 2010 14:11:14 IST
|
|
|
Now When galileo performed his experiment it was not in a vaccum here there was force retarding the motion (the viscous force) which depends on the velocity hence this leads to retardation which will be the function of distance as velocity increases with increase in distance.
|
this reply:
10 points
(with 2

in
2
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Feb 2010 11:18:29 IST
|
|
|
you mean that velocity decreases with increasing distance due to the viscous force because of air??
|
crazy abt SCIENCE!!!! |
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Feb 2010 17:54:59 IST
|
|
|
i dont quite inderstand ur qn...galelio concluded the rate of change of velocity is constant for all objects what is meant by that is it is independent of mass he never said anything about the rate of change of the same body with distance that rate differs due to acce due to gravity but the change is same for all bodies regardless of mass...this is what he meant if im correct u understood his statement wrongly...
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
20 Feb 2010 14:01:33 IST
|
|
|
no no this is not xactly a question, this line was written in ncert. nd thats why i asked it... look galileo was experimentin that tym and he found out that change in velocity with distance is not constant... it decreases with the increasing distance of falll.....so my question was how... nd its a free fall so mass does not come anywhere na?? its independent of the mass, xactly wat u said...
|
crazy abt SCIENCE!!!! |
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
20 Feb 2010 19:37:15 IST
|
|
|
When a body is in free fall, as galileo rightly pointed out the acceleration is the same (g). but i don't see anything responsible other than the viscous force of air for decreasing change in velocity with increasing distance! viscous force of air is extremely extremely small so i reckon it might be a misprint or maybe i have missed something :O
|
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Feb 2010 15:40:06 IST
|
|
|
Viscous force of air is not that small. When objects fall the drag force due to air is proportional to velocity of object. So when an object falls there will be a reduction in acceleration but not velocity. Velocity keeps on increasing till a stage where drag force becomes equal to the gravitational force on the fallin object. This velocity is termed as terminal velocity. Rain drops fall to earth in terminal velocity and without any acceleration. Most of the falling solid objects even burn off/melt before reaching earth due to air friction like meteors.
|
SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE |
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
23 Feb 2010 10:50:57 IST
|
|
|
thnx guys 4 helpin... i finally understood!!!!
|
crazy abt SCIENCE!!!! |
this reply:
0 points
(with 0

in
0
votes
)
[?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|